- Psychology 2.0
Editing
HowTo.Editing History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup
(:include ContributionOptions:)
(:redirect ContributionOptions:)
(:toc:)
Collaborative work
itt valamit idézni az overview-ból, hogy mi is ennek a site-nak az ő célja miért fontos a kritikai munka, mi a lényege, hogyan csináljuk For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find in the "write" section of the help, here.
Comment articles
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article (eg: liked or disliked, etc). You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. For commenting you don't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
Discuss articles
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of collaborative work. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something disputable in the article then this can be discussed in the article's discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Voting
ez inkább a voting conceptjéhez megy In science the experimental datas have great importance since that mean the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition.
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost up the psychological thinking and the quality of thinking.
To express whether a statement fit's into your experiences or not, go to the voting page by clicking in the SideBar the "VOTING" menu, then the "VOTE" title ez még aztán lehet hogy változik. stb-stb, ide még kell egy csomó minden ha működik a szavazás rész .
You can see the actual or final results of the voting under the "VOTING" menu's "RESULTS" title.
%ezen a help részen még van mit dolgozni%
(:include ContributionOptions:)
%ezen a help részen még van mit dolgozni%
ez inkább a voting conceptjéhez megy
To express whether a statement fit's into your experiences or not, go to the voting page by clicking in the SideBar the "VOTING" menu, then the "VOTE" title ez még aztán lehet hogy változik. stb-stb, ide még kell egy csomó minden ha működik a szavazás rész .
You can see the actual or final results of the voting under the "VOTING" menu's "RESULTS" title.
In science the experimental datas have great importance since that is the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition.
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.
In science the experimental datas have great importance since that mean the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition.
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost up the psychological thinking and the quality of thinking.
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.
Note: '*this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.*'
Note: this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.
Ami azt illeti én még nem látom át, hogy mi a szerepe a szavazásnak ezen a wiki-n, úgy értem mi az értelme annak, hogy valamiről eldöntjük, hogy igaz-e vagy nem. Ezzel kapcsolatban egy kis eszmefuttattás: amit én tudok a tudományos igazságokról: kezdetben vala
- a francia pozitivizmus: "a tudomány a tökéletes igazság megtalálására tör és ezt előbb utóbb el is fogja érni"
- popper: bizonyítani semmit nem lehet némely elméleti okok miatt (pl az, hogy egy végtelen világegyetemben bármikor találhatunk 1 kivételt a szabály alól, vagy épp a Gödel tétel). De Popper szerint a cáfolás, azaz falszifikáció viszont jó módszer a tudománynak. Ha nem is tudjuk, hogy egy elmélet jó-e, de legalább elvethetjük ha rossz (elég egy esetet találni, ami kivétel a szabály alól)
- kuhn: Rengeteg sikeres tudományos elmélet van, amit még falszifikálni sem lehet, azaz a popperi értelemben nem volna tudomány. Valójában a tudósokat annyira nem szokta érdekelni, hogy egy elmélet falszifikálható-e vagy nem, hogy bizonyítható-e vagy nem. A tudomány fejlődését nem racionális elemek határozzák meg, hanem egy speciális normákra épülő szociális tevékenységként kell rá tekintenünk. Az, hogy egy elmélet milyen népszerűségnek örvend attól függ, hogy mennyire illik bele a korba, mennyire érthető és elegáns, milyen kutatási reményekkel kecsegtet. És még ami Kuhntól van, hogy egy alapvetően hibás elmélet is nagyon jó és érdekes eredményre vezethet. Az elméletekre is érvényes valamiféle természetes kiválasztódás: a tudósok agya azokra lesz fogékony, amelyek a leghatékonyabban, legelegánsabban írják le a világot, szóval végül kiválasztódnak a jó elméletek, de ez a folyamat nem teljesen attól függ, hogy az elmélet konkrétan igaz-e vagy hamis.
Szóval ezért gondolom én azt, hogy a szavazás nem használna sokat az elméletek fejlődésének ha arra szolgálnának, hogy eldöntsék mi igaz és mi hamis. Az emberek attól még ugyanúgy tovább gondolkoznának az őket érdeklő és szerintük érdekes elméleteken, és ugyanúgy nem foglalkoznának azzal ami igaz, de egyéb szempontból hátrányos. Viszont szerintem nagyon jó hőmérő lehetne a szavazás - meg lehetne tudni, hogy a többség mit gondol az adott elméletről, véleményt lehetne nyilvánítani, ami mind a bevonódás szempontjából fontos gondolom, mind a fejlesztőknek való feedback-ként fontos.
In science the experimental datas have great importance since that is the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition.
In science the experimental datas have great importance since that is the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition. Note: '*this method doesn't replace the scientific experimental testing. All the theories presented here should be tested in scientific experiences once. But the present method help us to boost the development of the psychological theories.*'
In science the experimental datas have great importance since that is the only opportunity to test the theories whether they work or not. The process of testing is called experiment. Setting up a scientific experiment needs loads of resources and can be only applied with measurable phenomenons. For this two reasons Psychology 2.0 searched for another way of testing. It uses the collective experiences of people. We don't build up experiments to test our hypothesis but the community will decide whether the hypothesis is matching to their experiences or not. This method of testing enables a very fast but yet confidable way of cognition.
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of collaborative work. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something ambigous or disputable in the article then this topics can be discussed in the articles discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of collaborative work. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something disputable in the article then this can be discussed in the article's discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. For commenting you don't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article (eg: liked or disliked, etc). You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. For commenting you don't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find in the "write" esction of the help, here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find in the "write" section of the help, here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find in the "write" esction of the help, here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in this project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of this site. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something ambigous or disputable in the article then this topics can be discussed in the articles discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of collaborative work. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something ambigous or disputable in the article then this topics can be discussed in the articles discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. Commenting doesn't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. For commenting you don't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments], [[#discuss | discussionsdiscussions, votesvotes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments], [[#discuss | discussionsdiscussions, votesvotes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the pages of the site hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the articles, hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
Read documentation for help
Writing in a wiki
In a wiki each page can be edited using a very simple word processor. You can access the word processor by clicking on "Edit" in the left-bottom corner.
The text you type in the editor box appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
If you put a "!" at the beginning of a row, that row becomes a heading (bigger fonts). If you put 2 exclamation marks it becomes a sub-heading. If 3, then sub-sub-heading. See below
Producing lists
If a row starts with "*" (asterix) it becomes a part of a buleted list. If you put "#" it will be a numbered list If you put 2 or 3 (**, *** resp. ##, ###) sub-lists appear. See below
Starting new pages
You can start a new page by creating a link that shows nowhere. The wiki realises that there is no such document/page, so it offers for you to create it.
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
Links showing nowhere
The links that show nowhere are marked by dotted (blue or red) underline and a small question mark in superscript at the end of the word. By clicking on them you can create the new page
Further information on editing
Below the edit box (the blue area after you pressed Edit on a page) you can find a short reminder on the usage of different special characters.
Further resources
The most important pmwiki features you can find here, but they are also available from the above mentioned reminder.
Full pmwiki documentation is available from http://www.pmwiki.org/
Ami azt illeti én még nem látom át, hogy mi a szerepe a szavazásnak ezen a wiki-n, úgy értem mi az értelme annak, hogy valamiről eldöntjük, hogy igaz-e vagy nem. Ezzel kapcsolatban egy kis eszmefuttattás: amit én tudok a tudományos igazságokról: kezdetben vala
- a francia pozitivizmus: "a tudomány a tökéletes igazság megtalálására tör és ezt előbb utóbb el is fogja érni"
- popper: bizonyítani semmit nem lehet némely elméleti okok miatt (pl az, hogy egy végtelen világegyetemben bármikor találhatunk 1 kivételt a szabály alól, vagy épp a Gödel tétel). De Popper szerint a cáfolás, azaz falszifikáció viszont jó módszer a tudománynak. Ha nem is tudjuk, hogy egy elmélet jó-e, de legalább elvethetjük ha rossz (elég egy esetet találni, ami kivétel a szabály alól)
- kuhn: Rengeteg sikeres tudományos elmélet van, amit még falszifikálni sem lehet, azaz a popperi értelemben nem volna tudomány. Valójában a tudósokat annyira nem szokta érdekelni, hogy egy elmélet falszifikálható-e vagy nem, hogy bizonyítható-e vagy nem. A tudomány fejlődését nem racionális elemek határozzák meg, hanem egy speciális normákra épülő szociális tevékenységként kell rá tekintenünk. Az, hogy egy elmélet milyen népszerűségnek örvend attól függ, hogy mennyire illik bele a korba, mennyire érthető és elegáns, milyen kutatási reményekkel kecsegtet. És még ami Kuhntól van, hogy egy alapvetően hibás elmélet is nagyon jó és érdekes eredményre vezethet. Az elméletekre is érvényes valamiféle természetes kiválasztódás: a tudósok agya azokra lesz fogékony, amelyek a leghatékonyabban, legelegánsabban írják le a világot, szóval végül kiválasztódnak a jó elméletek, de ez a folyamat nem teljesen attól függ, hogy az elmélet konkrétan igaz-e vagy hamis.
Szóval ezért gondolom én azt, hogy a szavazás nem használna sokat az elméletek fejlődésének ha arra szolgálnának, hogy eldöntsék mi igaz és mi hamis. Az emberek attól még ugyanúgy tovább gondolkoznának az őket érdeklő és szerintük érdekes elméleteken, és ugyanúgy nem foglalkoznának azzal ami igaz, de egyéb szempontból hátrányos. Viszont szerintem nagyon jó hőmérő lehetne a szavazás - meg lehetne tudni, hogy a többség mit gondol az adott elméletről, véleményt lehetne nyilvánítani, ami mind a bevonódás szempontjából fontos gondolom, mind a fejlesztőknek való feedback-ként fontos.
Discussing articles is one of the most important feature of this site. If you have an opinion more detailed than it can be explaind in the comment box or there is something ambigous or disputable in the article then this topics can be discussed in the articles discussion page. The link for the discussion page is always at the bottom of the article, above the comment box.
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. Commenting doesn't need to be logged in, but it's
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. Commenting doesn't need to be logged in and can be done anonymously.
Collaborative work
itt valamit idézni az overview-ból, hogy mi is ennek a site-nak az ő célja miért fontos a kritikai munka, mi a lényege, hogyan csináljuk For reaching it's purpose the site uses the pmwiki engine which enables easy editing of the pages of the site hereby enable collaborative work. There are four forms of collaboration in the project: comments, discussions, votes and editing articles. The first three topics will be covered here, the help for editing you will find here.
Comment articles
Commenting articles is a very basic function of this site. We use comments for giving short feedbacks concerning the actual article, like you liked it or not, etc. You can find the comment box at the bottom of every article. Commenting doesn't need to be logged in, but it's
Discuss articles
Voting
Further documentation
Further resources
Documentation
Further documentation
Documentation
The most important pmwiki features you can find here, but they are also available from the above mentioned reminder.
Full pmwiki documentation is available from http://www.pmwiki.org/
Further information on editing
Below the edit box (the blue area after you pressed Edit on a page) you can find a short reminder on the usage of different special characters.
(:toc:)
The links that show nowhere are marked by dotted blue underline and a small question mark in superscript at the end of the word. By clicking on them you can create the new page
The links that show nowhere are marked by dotted (blue or red) underline and a small question mark in superscript at the end of the word. By clicking on them you can create the new page
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
Producing lists
Producing lists
Starting new pages
Starting new pages
Links showing nowhere
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
Producing lists
Producing lists
Starting new pages
Starting new pages
The text you type in appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
The text you type in the editor box appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
If you put a "!" at the beginning of a row, that row becomes a heading (bigger fonts). If you put 2 it becomes a sub-heading. If 3, then sub-sub-heading. See below
If you put a "!" at the beginning of a row, that row becomes a heading (bigger fonts). If you put 2 exclamation marks it becomes a sub-heading. If 3, then sub-sub-heading. See below
In a wiki each page can be edited using a very simple word processor. The text you type in appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
In a wiki each page can be edited using a very simple word processor. You can access the word processor by clicking on "Edit" in the left-bottom corner.
The text you type in appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
You can start a new page by creating a link that shows nowhere. The wiki realises that there is no such document/page, so it offers for you to create it. Links can be created by writing something between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
You can start a new page by creating a link that shows nowhere. The wiki realises that there is no such document/page, so it offers for you to create it.
Links can be created by writing something (also internet links) between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
The links that show nowhere are marked by dotted blue underline and a small question mark in superscript at the end of the word. By clicking on them you can create the new page
- starting new pages
Starting new pages
You can start a new page by creating a link that shows nowhere. The wiki realises that there is no such document/page, so it offers for you to create it. Links can be created by writing something between double brackets (" [[ ]]") or by pressing a dedicated button on the top of the editing box Ab
If a row starts with "*" (asterix) it becomes a part of a buleted list. If you put "#" it will be a numbered list See below
If a row starts with "*" (asterix) it becomes a part of a buleted list. If you put "#" it will be a numbered list If you put 2 or 3 (**, *** resp. ##, ###) sub-lists appear. See below
- lists
Producing lists
If a row starts with "*" (asterix) it becomes a part of a buleted list. If you put "#" it will be a numbered list See below
If you put a "!" at the beginning of a row, that row becomes a heading (bigger fonts). If you put 2 it becomes a sub-heading. If 3, then sub-sub-heading. See below
Writing in a wiki
In a wiki each page can be edited using a very simple word processor. The text you type in appears as you typed in. Thus, using special characters you can format your text and using special commands you can access special features. The possibilities are unlimited, but you will need three basic features in addition to typing in a text
Different levels of heading to split your text in sections
- lists
- starting new pages
