Guest | Login | New User

  • Psychology 2.0

Register!

HowTo.AdvantagesOfRegistration History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to markup

September 24, 2008, at 10:26 AM EST by Zsomb -
Changed lines 1-2 from:

(:title:)

to:

(:title Register!:)

Changed line 5 from:
to:

Advantages of registration

September 24, 2008, at 10:25 AM EST by Zsomb -
Changed line 1 from:

(:title Register:)

to:

(:title:)

September 24, 2008, at 10:25 AM EST by Zsomb -
Added lines 1-2:

(:title Register:)

September 24, 2008, at 10:24 AM EST by Zsomb -
Changed lines 1-3 from:

Advantages of being registered

to:

Register here

September 18, 2008, at 03:49 PM EST by Zsomb -
Changed line 2 from:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by vote, whether a Statement is True or False.
to:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by vote, whether a Statement is True or False.
September 18, 2008, at 03:48 PM EST by Zsomb -
Changed line 2 from:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by vote, whether a Statement is True or False.
to:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by vote, whether a Statement is True or False.
September 18, 2008, at 03:47 PM EST by Zsomb -
Changed lines 2-14 from:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not.
  • Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that the opinion of those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice in dealing with people are more relevant when a discussion or a voting of a scientific statement's truth takes place. That is why those who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.
  • So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some kind of proof that you own a relevant degree.
  • When time comes to voting the seniority counts again: a real pro's vote can be calculated even with 100 times as much weight as an unregistered user's (who we don't know how many times voted from different computers).
  • Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (to start a new topic).

The site is protected by Creative Common licenses. This means that your article can be published by anyone who mentions your name as the original author. (This can result that you become famous just by posting once an article on Psy2.org). That is also a reason why real names are requested.

to:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by vote, whether a Statement is True or False.
  • Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless disproved, we have to presume that the opinion of those who invest time and energy in gathering knowledge and practice in dealing with people are more relevant when a discussion or vote on a scientific statement's validity takes place. That is why the opinions of those who are more senior than others will be stressed in the community.
  • If you would like the community to listen to you according to your professional background, please do not conceal your credentials; upload copies of your degree(s) and professional certificates.
  • In voting, seniority counts: an expert user‘s vote can be calculated even with 100 times as much weight as an unregistered user's (who we don't know how many times voted from different computers).
  • Registration enables you to publish (to start a new topic).

The site is protected by Creative Common licenses. This means that your article can be published by anyone who mentions your name as the original author. That is why real names are requested.

Added lines 12-15:
September 08, 2008, at 10:45 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 3-8 from:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only in publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be the next step in building the science of psychology, voting has increased importance.
  • Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when such a decision has to be made. That is why those who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.
  • So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some personal data together with these proofs.
to:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not.
  • Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that the opinion of those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice in dealing with people are more relevant when a discussion or a voting of a scientific statement's truth takes place. That is why those who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.
  • So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some kind of proof that you own a relevant degree.
Changed line 13 from:

The site is protected by Creative Common licences. This means that what your write on the site can be published by someone if mentiones your name (without additional efforts you might become famous). That is also a reason why real names are requested.

to:

The site is protected by Creative Common licenses. This means that your article can be published by anyone who mentions your name as the original author. (This can result that you become famous just by posting once an article on Psy2.org). That is also a reason why real names are requested.

September 08, 2008, at 06:39 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed line 11 from:
to:
September 08, 2008, at 06:38 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 3-13 from:

szakértői döntéshozatalt kéne lemagyarázni vs. demokrata döntéshozatal

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only in publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be the next step in building the science of psychology, voting has increased importance.

Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when a decision has to be made. That is why thos who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.

So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some personal data together with these proofs.

When time comes to voting the seniority counts again: a real pro's vote can be calculated even with 100 times as much weight as an unregistered user's (who we don't know how many times voted from different computers).

Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (to start a new topic).

to:
  • Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only in publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be the next step in building the science of psychology, voting has increased importance.
  • Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when such a decision has to be made. That is why those who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.
  • So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some personal data together with these proofs.
  • When time comes to voting the seniority counts again: a real pro's vote can be calculated even with 100 times as much weight as an unregistered user's (who we don't know how many times voted from different computers).
  • Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (to start a new topic).
August 25, 2008, at 09:07 PM EST by farhad -
Changed line 17 from:

You can register here

to:

You can register here

August 07, 2008, at 04:11 PM EST by ian -
Changed lines 5-7 from:

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding with voting whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be a next brick in building psychology's science, voting has an increased importance.

Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when a decision has to be made. That is why thos who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.

to:

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only in publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding, by voting, whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be the next step in building the science of psychology, voting has increased importance.

Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (such as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when a decision has to be made. That is why thos who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.

May 11, 2008, at 11:59 PM EST by fodormik -
Added lines 15-16:

The site is protected by Creative Common licences. This means that what your write on the site can be published by someone if mentiones your name (without additional efforts you might become famous). That is also a reason why real names are requested.

May 11, 2008, at 11:54 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 13-14 from:

Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (Howto.startnewto start a new topic).

to:

Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (to start a new topic).

May 11, 2008, at 11:53 PM EST by fodormik -
Changed lines 5-6 from:

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding with voting whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be a next brick in building psychology's science, voting has an increased importance.

to:

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding with voting whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be a next brick in building psychology's science, voting has an increased importance.

May 11, 2008, at 11:52 PM EST by fodormik -
Added lines 1-16:

Advantages of being registered

szakértői döntéshozatalt kéne lemagyarázni vs. demokrata döntéshozatal

Psychology 2.0's purpose is not only publishing different theories written by the community about people in general, but also deciding with voting whether a Statement is true or not. Aiming for scientific results that can be a next brick in building psychology's science, voting has an increased importance.

Although we believe that people are equal, their knowledge and experience in a specific area (as dealing with people) can differ. Unless proved other way, we have to suppose that those who invested time and energy to gather knowledge and practice on people are more relevant when a decision has to be made. That is why thos who prove that are more senior than others will have stressed opinions in the community.

So if you would like that the community should listen to you according to what you deserve based on your background, please don't hide the proofs that you are a pro. In order to do that you have to send us some personal data together with these proofs.

When time comes to voting the seniority counts again: a real pro's vote can be calculated even with 100 times as much weight as an unregistered user's (who we don't know how many times voted from different computers).

Registration gives you also the opportunity to publish (Howto.startnewto start a new topic).

You can register here