- Psychology 2.0
The Voting
HowTo.TheVoting History
Hide minor edits - Show changes to output
September 18, 2008, at 02:41 PM EST
by -
Changed lines 1-3 from:
!Psychology 2.0's key concept is the voting
*voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
*voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
to:
!Psychology 2.0's key concept is voting, as:
*voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource-consuming experiment
*voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource-consuming experiment
Changed lines 4-5 from:
*the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
*the usage of the voting: insert in an article the following markup
*the usage of the voting: insert in an article the following markup
to:
*the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
*the usage of the voting: insert into an article the following markup
*the usage of the voting: insert into an article the following markup
Changed line 9 from:
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying' :)
to:
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worthy to try' :)
September 15, 2008, at 09:17 AM EST
by -
Changed lines 7-11 from:
[=(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)=]
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)
to:
(:markup class="horiz":)
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying' :)
(:markupend:)
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying' :)
(:markupend:)
September 15, 2008, at 09:16 AM EST
by -
Added line 8:
Added line 10:
September 15, 2008, at 09:15 AM EST
by -
Changed line 7 from:
(:markup class="horiz":)
to:
[=(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)=]
Changed line 9 from:
(:markupend:)
to:
September 15, 2008, at 09:13 AM EST
by -
Added lines 6-15:
*the usage of the voting: insert in an article the following markup
(:markup class="horiz":)
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)
(:markupend:)
where
**id – This is a serial number of the voting modules present in the page starting from 1 and up to an unlimited number.
**ask – This is the survey question to be asked. It should be enclosed with single quotes.
**option1 – This is the first survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes
**option2– This is the second survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes.
**option3 – This is the third survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes. The third survey response is optional.
(:markup class="horiz":)
(:vote id=1 ask='Do you think it is a good idea to use the voting for scientific purposes?' option1='Yes' option2='No' option3='It is worth trying':)
(:markupend:)
where
**id – This is a serial number of the voting modules present in the page starting from 1 and up to an unlimited number.
**ask – This is the survey question to be asked. It should be enclosed with single quotes.
**option1 – This is the first survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes
**option2– This is the second survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes.
**option3 – This is the third survey response. It should be enclosed in single quotes. The third survey response is optional.
September 08, 2008, at 06:10 PM EST
by -
Changed lines 3-5 from:
*Voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
*When voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*The voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
*When voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*The voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
to:
*voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
*when voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
*when voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*the voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
September 06, 2008, at 10:10 PM EST
by -
Added lines 1-5:
!Psychology 2.0's key concept is the voting
*Voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
*When voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*The voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
*Voting is viewed as an opinion pool that credits the results of a resource consuming experiment
*When voting, not everybody is equal: based on seniority and professional background people can have different voting weights
*The voting weights are awarded by a committee based on degree, years of experience, special reputation and contribution to the community's work
